On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> I'm concerned though whether this would amount to a protocol break.
>
>> Me, too.
>
> There are enough CCI's floating around the code that there may not
> actually be any observable problem, at least not in typical cases.
> That would explain the lack of complaints ...

It's pretty to think so, but I've been doing this long enough to be skeptical.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to