On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> I'm concerned though whether this would amount to a protocol break. > >> Me, too. > > There are enough CCI's floating around the code that there may not > actually be any observable problem, at least not in typical cases. > That would explain the lack of complaints ...
It's pretty to think so, but I've been doing this long enough to be skeptical. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers