Kohei KaiGai <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> writes:
> I noticed cash_mul_int8 / cash_div_int8 are defined in cash.c,
> however, pg_proc.h and pg_operator.h contains no relevant entries.
> Is it just a careless oversight?
Hm. I'd be inclined to fix that by removing the dead code, since
it's evidently useless. For that matter, I doubt we need the int2
and flt4 variants; might as well depend on automatic promotions.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
