On 2015-10-16 16:41:16 +0300, Shay Rojansky wrote: > > If not, the only solution I can see is for PostgreSQL to not protest if it > > sees the > > parameter in the startup packet. > > > > Yeah, that's the ideal solution here as far as I'm concerned.
Well, it seems that's where we're ending up then. Could you prepare a patch? Regards, Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
