On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >>> What would happen if we didn't do anything at all? >> >> Nothing, really. It's essentially some code beautification. A worthwhile >> goal, but certainly not a release blocker. > > While I agree with this assessment, I think that there is value in > doing it before release, to ease keeping the branches in sync. That > seems like the better time to backpatch to 9.5. That was the thinking > behind putting it on the open items list.
That makes sense, but I think it's time to remove anything that doesn't smell like an actual release blocker. I'll go do that. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
