On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:11 AM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote:
> On 10/17/15 10:25 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > > I think that we should just suggest a reverse formula of the maximum > > soft limit of checkpoint_segments for max_wal_size in the release notes > > of 9.5, basically: > > (3 * your_old_checkpoint_segments + 1) * 16MB = max_wal_size > > How about this patch? > > (Actually, I'd remove the + 1 to make the numbers come out rounder.) > Removing the + 1 is fine for me. + been removed. Its place it taken by the new "Its place is taken". Other than those little things this looks fine to me. Regards, -- Michael
