On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > >> Thanks. For comparison, I wrote a patch to implement what I had in mind. >> >> When a WAL-skipping COPY begins, we add an entry for that relation in a >> "pending-fsyncs" hash table. Whenever we perform any action on a heap that >> would normally be WAL-logged, we check if the relation is in the hash table, >> and skip WAL-logging if so. > > I think this wasn't applied, was it?
No, it was not applied. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
