Andres Freund wrote: > FWIW, adding an <> operator for xid seems like a perfectly good idea.
+1 (two of them actually -- another one for <>(xid,int) which mirrors the =(xid,int) we already have). -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers