Andres Freund wrote:

> FWIW, adding an <> operator for xid seems like a perfectly good idea.

+1 (two of them actually -- another one for <>(xid,int) which mirrors
the =(xid,int) we already have).

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to