Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> I think it's just failure to update an expected-file, but will leave it > >> to Alvaro. > > > I don't understand. It passed make check fine for me on both branches. > > Will fix in a jiffy. > > There are two variant expected files for that module --- did you fix > both?
Yeah, this was the problem: make installcheck almost always exercises the case with the setting disabled, which make check doesn't test. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
