On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > After studying the proposed patch a bit more, I still think the example > is good, but the added text doesn't do much to explain your point. If > I get what your point is, which maybe I don't, I think the attached might > clarify it better. What do you think of this version?
Robert seemed to want to keep the example short, which I took on board, but I myself think that your more worked out treatment is better. I think this revision makes my point very well. I recommend committing it. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
