On 2015-10-30 10:57:45 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > adding a parseInput(conn) into the loop yields the expected > > FATAL: 57P01: terminating connection due to unexpected postmaster exit > > Is there really any reason not to do that? > > Might work, but it probably needs some study:
Yea, definitely. I was just at pgconf.eu's keynote catching up on a talk. No fully thought through proposal's to be expected ;) > (a) is it safe I don't immediately see why not. > (b) is this the right place / are there other places I think it's ok for the send failure case, in a quick lookthrough I didn't find anything else for writes - I'm not entirely sure all read cases are handled tho, but it seems less likely to be mishandles. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
