On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Andres Freund wrote: >>>> Among the five patches marked as ready for committer, one is a bug fix >>>> that should be back-patched (ahem). Shouldn't we move on with those >>>> entries first? >>> >>> I think at this point we essentially can just move all entries to the >>> next. Will do that, and note down which patches haven't gotten any real >>> review. >> >> We are close to the end of the month. Should I move on to do the >> vacuuming or are you planning to do it? At this stage, to be fair with >> people whose patches are in "waiting on author" state and because >> there is not much time until the next CF begins, I propose to remove >> all the remaining 43 entries with the same status as currently listed: >> Needs review: 26. Waiting on Author: 11. Ready for Committer: 6.
So, seeing nothing happening I have done the above, opened 2015-11 CF and closed the current one. > Gosh, that's a lot of stuff that didn't get reviewed. :-( Yep. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
