Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> As a down payment on this problem, maybe we could invent a new planner >> header that provides just enough info to support amapi.h and fdwapi.h; >> it looks like this would be "typedef struct PlannerInfo PlannerInfo;", >> likewise for RelOptInfo, ForeignPath, and IndexPath, and real declarations >> of Cost and Selectivity.
> Works for me, under the assumption that, down the road and without any > rush, we can shuffle some more stuff around to make this whole area a > bit cleaner. Well, since we're at the start of a devel cycle, we'd have the rest of 9.6 for somebody to whack it around to their heart's content. Once we ship 9.6 it would get a little harder to redefine the new header(s). >> Not sure what to name the new header. > Yeah, this is always a problem for such patches :-( I have no great > ideas ATM. I'll draft something, but in the meantime, file name ideas solicited. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers