On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> OK, I see. Fixing comments in the back-branches is not always a >> productive use of time, and in general I might like it if you pushed >> for such things less frequently. But I've done it anyway in this >> instance. > > I guess I favor doing it where the comment is actually wrong, which > does apply here -- we don't *rely* on anything. We could very well > abort when state is TSS_BUILDRUNS, but we elect not too, since > TSS_BUILDRUNS is taken to mean that it's too late for aborting to be > worth it.
Fair point. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
