> Okay, I think one more point to consider is that it would be preferable to > > have such an option for backend sessions and not for other processes > > like WalSender. > > All right...I see the usage.. I withdraw my objection to 'session' > prefix then now that I understand the case. So, do you agree that: > > *) session_idle_timeout: dumps the backend after X time in 'idle' state > and > *) transaction_timeout: cancels transaction after X time, regardless of > state > > sounds good? >
Not too much *) transaction_timeout: cancels transaction after X time, regardless of state This is next level of statement_timeout. I can't to image sense. What is a issue solved by this property? Pavel > > merlin >
