On 11/04/2015 01:24 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > I agree with Pavel. Having a transaction timeout just does not make any > sense. I can see absolutely no use for it. An idle-in-transaction > timeout, on the other hand, is very useful.
+1 -- agreed Joe -- Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
