On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Haribabu Kommi > <kommi.harib...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I marked this patch as ready for committer. > > The patch says: > > If a background worker registers to receive asynchronous notifications > with the <command>LISTEN</command> through <acronym>SPI</acronym>, > there is currently no way for incoming notifications to be received. > > But wouldn't it be more correct to say: > > If a background worker registers to receive asynchronous notifications > with the <command>LISTEN</command> through <acronym>SPI</acronym>, the > worker will log those notifications, but there is no programmatic way > for the worker to intercept and respond to those notifications.
Yes, the above description is good. Regards, Hari Babu Fujitsu Australia -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
