2015-11-09 13:50 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com>: > > > 2015-11-09 13:32 GMT+01:00 YUriy Zhuravlev <u.zhurav...@postgrespro.ru>: > >> On Monday 09 November 2015 13:29:30 you wrote: >> > It is ugly, but you can wrap it to function - so still I don't see any >> > reason, why it is necessary >> For example, I'm writing a lot of queries by hands... >> This functionality is available in many languages and it's just >> convenient. Of >> course it is possible and without it, but why? >> > > New symbols increase a complexity of our code and our documentation. > > If some functionality can be implemented via functions without performance > impacts, we should not to create new operators or syntax - mainly for > corner use cases. >
I can understand, so current system of accessing array data has some disadvantage - the behave was designed twenty years ago, when the arrays didn't support NULLs, but I am not sure, if introduction secondary accessing system helps. Probably not. Regards Pavel > > Regards > > Pavel > > > >> >> Thanks. >> -- >> YUriy Zhuravlev >> Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com >> The Russian Postgres Company >> >> >> -- >> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) >> To make changes to your subscription: >> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers >> > >
