On 2015-11-09 19:46:37 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Well, after much digging, I've found what seems a workable answer. > It turns out that the original form of FlowObjectSetup is just > unbelievably awful [...]. > > This gets us down to ~135000 strings to build HEAD, and not incidentally, > the resulting PDF is about half the size it was before. I think I've > also fixed a number of formerly unexplainable broken hyperlinks in the > PDF; some are still broken, but they were that way before. (It looks > like <xref> with endterm doesn't work very well in jadetex; all the > remaining bad links seem to be associated with uses of that.)
Nice work. On an ugly subject. > Barring objection I'll commit this tomorrow. I'm inclined to back-patch > it at least into 9.5, maybe further, because I'm afraid we may be closer > than we realized to exceeding the strings limit in the back branches too. +1 for doing this in 9.5+. I think we will probably want this in all branches at some point. I don't have a strong opinion on whether we want to let this mature in 9.5 or not. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
