On 14 November 2015 at 00:16, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> wrote: > I can't see a way to make that work reliably. It would need to be > 10^estimate_ln_weight(base) and the problem is that both exp and > ln_weight could be too big to fit in double variables, and become > HUGE_VAL, losing all precision.
Of course I meant 10^ln_weight could be too big to fit in a double. Regards, Dean -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers