Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> In general I think we can be a good deal more liberal about backpatching the
>> testing regime than we are with production code, where we are always
>> cautious, and the caution has paid big dividends in our reputation for
>> stability.
> Attached are patches for 9.4 and 9.5 syncing up everything with
> master. I tested both of them on OSX, Linux and Windows (MSVC only
> though using vcregress tapcheck).
I'm not in a position to double-check that these patches work on Windows,
but I reviewed them through the expedient of diff'ing the patched files
against HEAD. The only problem I found was you'd left out the
documentation addition about needing IPC::Run in install-windows.sgml.
So I've pushed them with that fix.
Where do we now stand on invoking the TAP tests in the buildfarm?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
