Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote:
>
> > FETCH LAST should return the last one row.
> > FETCH RELATIVE m should return a row after skipping
> > m rows if we follow the SQL standard and so the current
> > implementation of FETCH RELATIVE is broken.
>
> Yes, the syntax could probably be
> FETCH [n] RELATIVE m
> to keep the functionality to fetch n rows at once and not only one
> after skipping m rows.
What I've thought is
FETCH RELATIVE m [n].
Either is OK to me.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
http://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
