Pavel Stehule wrote: > so pg_size_bytes is good enough for everybody?
That seems good enough to me. I would have it accept GiB and GB and have both transform to base 2, and have an optional boolean flag whose non-default value turns the GB interpretation into base 10, leaving the GiB interpretation unaffected. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
