On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 05:01:43PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > Hi, > > [snip] > > If we had a Parallel Index Scan which worked like a Parallel Seq > Scan,
That sounds like a very handy thing to have. Any idea whether it's possible for 9.6? Is there any of the Parallel Seq Scan code that looks like it could be reused or slightly generalized for the implementation? Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <[email protected]> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: [email protected] Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
