Greg Stark <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think that would put us in a situation where DKIM signatures would still >> pass, at least unless the source insisted on signing Sender: too.
> Incidentally I'm confused about your concern about Sender. Sender has > almost no significance for email afaik. The PG lists do not think so; for example in -hackers traffic you will find Sender: [email protected] which matches the envelope From address. Every other mailing list I'm on behaves similarly. Now, I'm not an email standards guru so I have no idea whether that's actually necessary or not, but I kinda doubt that you're right and all the mailing list software authors are wrong. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
