2015-11-27 17:54 GMT+01:00 Teodor Sigaev <teo...@sigaev.ru>: > Is this patch in 'Waiting on Author' state actually?
yes I'll try redesign patch by Peter's proposal Pavel > > > I don't think it's right to reuse SPIError for this. SPIError is >>> clearly meant to signal an error in the SPI calls. Of course, we >>> can't >>> stop users from raising whatever exception they want, but if we're >>> going >>> to advertise that users can raise exceptions, then we should create >>> separate exception classes. >>> >>> I suppose the proper way to set this up would be to create a base >>> class >>> like plpy.Error and derive SPIError from that. >>> >>> >>> Do you have some ideas about the name of this class? >>> >> >> I think plpy.Error is fine. >> >> >> >> > -- > Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teo...@sigaev.ru > WWW: > http://www.sigaev.ru/ >
