On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Vinayak <vinpok...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the v7. > Please check the comment below. > -Table name in the vacuum progress > > + snprintf(progress_message[0], PROGRESS_MESSAGE_LENGTH, "%s.%s", > schemaname,relname);
Uh, I hope that line doesn't appear in the patch. We're scarcely likely to commit anything that has such an obvious SQL-injection risk built into it. https://xkcd.com/327/ -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
