Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > There's another seemingly wrong result, not with lateral, but with FOR > UPDATE.
[ shrug... ] You're getting the post-update images of the two join
rows that would have been reported without FOR UPDATE. This one is
definitely not a bug.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
