Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > Michael Paquier wrote: > >> We would definitely want something within the ephemeral port range, so > >> we are up to that: > >> rand() * 16384 + 49152; > > > Yes, this seems to produce the correct range. > > Speaking of ephemeral port range ... if get_new_node() were to run > past port 65535, which is certainly possible with this new code, > it would fail altogether. Seems it needs to wrap around properly > within that port range.
Oh, of course. Pushed fix. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
