On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > At Sat, 5 Dec 2015 21:05:29 +0900, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote in > <cab7npqsxcdm-5nfwdf8zukmw8j_ooe6zyrqyqasp0fjkxkd...@mail.gmail.com> > > Regarding the patch, I > > would tend to think that we should just reject it and try to cruft > > something that could be more pluggable if there is really a need. > > Thoughts? > > Honestly saying, I feel similarly with you:p I personally will do > something like the following for the original objective.
Are there other opinions? The -1 team is in majority at the end of this thread.. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
