Hello,

At Tue, 8 Dec 2015 20:50:39 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> 
wrote in <CAB7nPqR7UkYAhiFu=-w6m30ku-9zsfpqert1ldlwktyaxzl...@mail.gmail.com>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> > > <please do not top-post, it breaks the logic of the thread>
> >
> > I believe I haven't ripped off any in CC: list or In-Reply-To and
> > References in the previous post. (I read "top-post" as a post
> > without these headers.)  Could you let me know how the message
> > was broken?
> 
> 20151126.144512.10228250.horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp just did that
> when you sent this new patch series:
> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/mailing-list-faq/etiquette.html#idp55416272

Thank you for the reference. I made it because I didn't regard it
as a reply to (my) previous message but an update. I'll take care
to avoid top-posting in any case, though.

regards,

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center




-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to