Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:55:40AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> I'm starting to think that maybe we'd better knuckle under and provide >> a variant expected file that matches this behavior. We're likely to be >> seeing it in the wild for some time to come.
> I would look at handling this by suppressing the exact error message from the > output. I had actually thought a little bit about whether we could put back the missing output, along the lines of "if it's a syntax-type error and no error cursor was supplied, assume we should put a cursor at end of input". It might be worth pursuing if Veillard indicates an unwillingness to change libxml2 going forward, because a syntax error with no location can be pretty unfriendly. But I'll wait to see some response from him before expending a lot of energy here. > A variant expected output would be okay, though. I pushed a set of those an hour ago. I hope it's just a short-term hack, but we'll see. In any case there were now two buildfarm critters failing, reinforcing the idea that this behavior is spreading. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers