On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Andres Freund <[email protected]> wrote: > Again. Unless I miss something that was solved in > www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/[email protected] > > Personally I think we should add lz4 and maybe on strongly compressing > algorithm and be done with it. Runtime extensibility will make this much > more complicated, and I doubt it's worth the complexity.
+1, at the end we are going to have the same conclusion as for FPW compression when we discussed that, let's just switch to something that is less CPU-consuming than pglz, and lz4 is a good candidate for that. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
