Joe Conway wrote: > On 12/17/2015 11:58 AM, Christopher Browne wrote: > > On 17 December 2015 at 14:16, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com > > <mailto:pavel.steh...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> or different idea - just enforce syntax check without execution. > > > > That seems pretty cool... I'd find "syntax check without execution" to > > be pretty useful to test SQL (and especially DDL). > > Like this? > https://github.com/jconway/pgsynck
I thought the idea was to test the execution of the commands themselves, not just the syntax. Something like add a column here and see whether this other complex UPDATE populates it correctly. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
