> While I haven't thought about it very hard, it seems to me that a role > might be equivalent or nearly so to a group. If so, we might be able > to support roles with little more than some syntactic-sugar work ...
A few other changes, like allowing ownership of an object to be a group (role) rather than strictly a user. -- Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
