On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: >> To committers: there are 4 patches waiting for input. > > Those are: > > : SQL function to report log message > > AFAICT, there is no committer who likes this idea enough to commit it. > It's questionable whether we need such a feature at all, and it's even > more questionable whether this particular instantiation of the feature > is well-designed. I'm not going to opine as to whether it should get > marked "returned with feedback" or "rejected", but I doubt it's going > to get committed as-is.
Thanks, that's hard to follow all those threads. Let's cut the apple in half and mark it as returned with feedback then. > : Reusing abbreviated keys during second pass of ordered [set] aggregates > > Robert has been committer for all the predecessor patches, so I assume > this one will be his. > > : Speedup timestamp/time/date output functions > > I'd look into this if Andres hadn't already claimed it ... > > : Improving replay of XLOG_BTREE_VACUUM records > > Heikki and Andres have already reviewed this, so I assume one or the > other of them will be committer. OK, if those don't get addressed soon, they will be moved to the next CF with the same status. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
