On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Right. I don't think that we should back-patch that stuff into 9.5. > > OK, so I've gone ahead and committed and back-patched that. Can you > please rebase and repost the remainder as a 9.6 proposal?
OK. I don't know why you didn't acknowledge in your revision to sortsupport.h that bitwise inequality must be a reliable proxy for authoritative value inequality, which is a stronger restriction than mandating that abbreviated keys always be pass-by-value, but I'm not going to argue. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
