On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Corey Huinker <corey.huin...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Attached is the patch / diff against current master. > > I have moved this patch to next CF, there is a new patch, but no reviews. > -- > Michael > That's fair. I'm still at a loss for how to show that the fetch size was respected by the remote server, suggestions welcome!
