On 2015-12-30 12:50:58 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Right, and what I was wondering was whether adding the additional wait-for > condition had exposed some pre-existing flaw in the Windows latch code. > But that's not it, so we're left with the conclusion that we broke > something that used to work.
4bad60e is another suspect. Besides wondering why I moved the FD_CLOSE case out of the existing if cases, I don't see anything suspicious though. If we were hitting the write-path here, it'd be plausible that we're hitting an issue with FD_CLOSE and waiting for writability; but we're not. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
