On 1/3/16 11:05 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
I'll take a look, but Michael, if you have time to review, an extra set
>of eyeballs wouldn't hurt. There is no margin for error right now.
I'm just on it:) Will update in a couple of minutes, I noticed some
stuff in Jim's patch.
BTW, in case you miss it... I was inconsistent with the list
length_names checks... one is
if (list_length(names) > 1)
the other is
if (list_length(names) != 1)
(stringToQualifiedNameList() can't actually return a 0 length list and
IIRC there was another place doing a > check.)
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
