On 12/10/15 6:25 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
Recently I had need of removing occurrences of a number of values from
an array. Obviously I could have nested array_remove() call or wrapped
the whole thing in a SELECT unnest(), but that seems rather silly and
inefficient.
Any one have objections to changing array_replace_internal() to make
search and replace arrays instead of Datums?
Seeing none... let's see if someone wants to tackle this.
The goal is to modify array_replace_internal() (in
src/backend/utils/adt/arrayfuncs.c) so that two of it's arguments
(search and replace) can be arrays. I believe the best way to do that
would be to add bool search_isarray and bool replace_isarray arguments,
and have array_replace_internal() act accordingly if those are true.
The expected behavior when search_isarray is true would be to search for
a group of elements that completely match the search array. When
replace_isarray is true, then any replacements into *array would be the
elements from replace, growing or shrinking the array as necessary.
The user visible array_remove and array_replace functions will need to
check the data type of their inputs using get_fn_expr_argtype(). You can
find examples of that in arrayfuncs.c.
A complete patch will also need regression tests
(src/test/regress/sql/arrays.sql) and tweaks to the documentation for
those functions (doc/src/sgml/func.sgml).
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
