Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Obviously this wasn't the best idea ever. Andrew suggests on IM to
>> revert this on Cygwin to just do the "isatty" check as originally.
> Here's a proposed patch. Thoughts?
Ugly, but it will hold the fort until someone can debug the service
code for Cygwin.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
