On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 15:20, Justin Clift wrote: > > Now, we don't necessarily have a speed problem, as people who take the > time to tune the database can attest to, so this is making me consider > why such a large percentage of folk would vote for that. > > The possibilities that come to mind immediately are:
+ people measure postgresql by the speed of bulk imports which seem to be faster on other dbs (I'm only repeating what I often see on the lists), and don't consider that this is not something most people do on a regular basis. btw, PITR would get more hits if more people knew what it means... (Yes, I know what it is, but I think many who don't read the mailing lists etc. don't). cheers -- vbi -- featured link: http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/subkeys
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
