On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > [ rewinding to here from the detour I led us on ] > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 4:02 AM, David Rowley > <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Now, there has been talk of this previously, on various threads, but I don't >> believe any final decisions were made on how exactly it should be done. At >> the moment I plan to make changes as follows:
Oh, one more point: is there any reason why all of this needs to be a single (giant) patch? I feel like the handling of internal states could be a separate patch from the basic patch to allow partial aggregation and aggregate-combining, and that the latter could be committed first if we had a reasonably final version of it. That seems like it would be easier from a review standpoint, and might allow more development to proceed in parallel, too. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
