On 01/20/2016 09:31 AM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
I think one thing we should work on, is being absolutely religious about
requiring, say, 2 reviews for every nontrivial contribution. We
currently seem to have a significantly increased submission rate, and at
the same time the number of reviews per patch has gone down
substantially. I think the "honor" system has failed in that regard.
Good point, totally agree.
So the project should try to think of new ideas on how to incentivise reviewing?
I have three ideas so far:
4. Submit a patch, review a patch.
Don't review patches? Don't submit patches.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
