Paul Ramsey <pram...@cleverelephant.ca> writes: > Thank the Maker, it is reproduceable: returning an expanded header in the _in > function is not appreciated in a very narrow number of cases.
Thanks for finding a test case! I'll check into it shortly.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
