On 2016-01-21 11:33:15 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > I don't think it's strongly related - the contention here is on read > > access to the clog, not on write access. > > Aren't reads on clog contended with parallel writes to clog?
Sure. But you're not going to beat "no access to the clog" due to hint bits, by making parallel writes a bit better citizens. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
