On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:54 AM, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > The idea here is that we want downwards compatibility as far as possible and > maintainable but we can't really be upwards compatible for breaking protocol > revisions. So the output plugin's native protocol version is inherently the > max protocol version and we don't need a separate MAX.
That idea seems right to me. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
