On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 7:07 AM, Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote: > I do not think that it is really worth fixing, but I will not prevent anyone > to fix it.
I still think it does. Well, if there is consensus to address this one and optionally the other integer overflows even on back branches, I'll write a patch and let's call that a deal. This is not a problem from my side. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
