On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > In terms of this project overall, NumLWLocks() now knows about only > > four categories of stuff: fixed lwlocks, backend locks (proc.c), > > replication slot locks, and locks needed by extensions. I think it'd > > probably be fine to move the backend locks into PGPROC directly, and > > the replication slot locks into ReplicationSlot. > > > > IIdus has written a patch to move backend locks into PGPROC which > I am reviewing and will do performance tests once he responds to > my review comments and I have written a patch to move replication > slot locks into ReplicationSlot which is attached with this mail. > This patch looks good for me. It compiles without warnings, passes regression tests. I also did small testing of replication slots in order to check that it works correctly. ------ Alexander Korotkov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
