On 1 February 2016 at 09:45, Alexander Korotkov <a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> >> On 29 January 2016 at 21:11, Alexander Korotkov >> <a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: >>> >>> Should we think more about naming? Does two kinds of generic records >>> confuse people? >> >> >> Logical messages >> >> Generic WAL records >> >> Seems like I can tell them apart. Worth checking, but I think we're OK. > > > I was worrying because topic name is "Generic WAL logical messages". But if > we name them just "Logical messages" then it's OK for me. >
Yeah the patch talks about logical messages, I use different title in mailing list and CF to make it more clear on first sight what this actually is technically. -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
